Why can't I read all these books!? 🍋🟩
🍵 Lots of nonfiction, literary fiction, poetry, classical literature, speculative fiction, magical realism, etc.
📖 Beaucoup de non-fiction et de fiction, de poésie, des classiques, du spéculatif, du réalisme magique, etc.
💬 they/them ; iel/lo 💻 blog: gersande.com/blog & gersande.com/blogue 💌 Find me on fedi @silvan.cloud/@gersande or bsky
This link opens in a pop-up window
4% complete! Gersande La Flèche has read 4 of 100 books.
@battlepoet I don't think so! But I imagine a lot of the themes and frameworks might cross-pollinate, you know?
@battlepoet I don't think so! But I imagine a lot of the themes and frameworks might cross-pollinate, you know?
En ce début de xve siècle, tout est chaos au Royaume de France : les …
Ça commence très fort!
Published in 2004, it is an alternative history set in 19th-century England around the time …
He hardly ever spoke of magic, and when he did it was like a history lesson and no one could bear to listen to him.
It is time. I read Piranesi last year (2021) and was completely transported. I knew I wanted to pick up Norrell&Strange but the size is daunting and I want to give it proper attention. Hopefully I will have good reading time in the next couple weeks. Wish me luck!
(Also I sadly don't have a physical copy of this bad boy, I have a trusty epub instead!)
He hardly ever spoke of magic, and when he did it was like a history lesson and no one could bear to listen to him.
It is time. I read Piranesi last year (2021) and was completely transported. I knew I wanted to pick up Norrell&Strange but the size is daunting and I want to give it proper attention. Hopefully I will have good reading time in the next couple weeks. Wish me luck!
(Also I sadly don't have a physical copy of this bad boy, I have a trusty epub instead!)
This book teaches game designers, aspiring game developers, and game design students how to take a digital game project from …
Aura is a short novel written by Mexican novelist Carlos Fuentes, first published in 1962 in Mexico. This novel is …
In the late 1960’s, and early 1970’s, an enigmatic serial killer terrorized the San Francisco …
Done, by the end it was a relief to put this one away. The first part of the book was a very quick read through the factual details of the case. Become less readable in later chapters, as these are in fact episode transcriptions, and without facts to rely on, the discussions about conjecture become repetitive and tedious.
At one point they mentioned factual issues with Robert Graysmith's seminal yellow book on the Zodiac killer, and I really wish they had discussed those in further detail.
Interesting if you need an overview of the facts in chronological order, but I wouldn't necessarily recommend sticking around past those chapters.
There were the odd spelling errors, typos, and mispelled names of places or people. Probably awkwardness left over from the transcription.
Done, by the end it was a relief to put this one away. The first part of the book was a very quick read through the factual details of the case. Become less readable in later chapters, as these are in fact episode transcriptions, and without facts to rely on, the discussions about conjecture become repetitive and tedious.
At one point they mentioned factual issues with Robert Graysmith's seminal yellow book on the Zodiac killer, and I really wish they had discussed those in further detail.
Interesting if you need an overview of the facts in chronological order, but I wouldn't necessarily recommend sticking around past those chapters.
There were the odd spelling errors, typos, and mispelled names of places or people. Probably awkwardness left over from the transcription.
In the late 1960’s, and early 1970’s, an enigmatic serial killer terrorized the San Francisco …
(I should have waited until I was at 69% so I could have just made a single-word comment!)
Despite it seeming like I'm barely above half-way through the book, because of how big the footnotes/attached materials are, I'm actually getting pretty close to the end of the actual chapters of this. The moment the book departs from the facts and enters speculation territory (apart from an interesting episode on some very preliminary code-breaking basics) it really loses steam for me. There's a chance I won't finish this.
(I should have waited until I was at 69% so I could have just made a single-word comment!)
Despite it seeming like I'm barely above half-way through the book, because of how big the footnotes/attached materials are, I'm actually getting pretty close to the end of the actual chapters of this. The moment the book departs from the facts and enters speculation territory (apart from an interesting episode on some very preliminary code-breaking basics) it really loses steam for me. There's a chance I won't finish this.
Vincent Bevins: The Jakarta Method
The Jakarta Method: Washington's Anticommunist Crusade and the Mass Murder Program that Shaped Our World is a 2020 nonfiction book …
The Crying of Lot 49 is a 1966 novel by American author Thomas Pynchon. The …
Throwing on the TBR based on Darius' notes.
(Wait, I thought I imported the English book, but I guess it's the French one. Well, note to self, this is originally in English, get that version if you can.)
Throwing on the TBR based on Darius' notes.
(Wait, I thought I imported the English book, but I guess it's the French one. Well, note to self, this is originally in English, get that version if you can.)
A Girl Is a Half-formed Thing is the debut novel of Eimear McBride published in …
Recommended to me by @la_panique! Irish literature! Somewhat Joycean in spirit!
In the late 1960’s, and early 1970’s, an enigmatic serial killer terrorized the San Francisco …
About to start chapter 10. We're getting heavy into the speculation and "never before revealed/seen" suspects of these unsolved cases. The book is divided pretty neatly into the first 7-8 being a fairly straightforward chronological narrative of the 5 murders and sightings/communications with the zodiac, and the 4-5 last chapter are really about the suspects and what the evidence does and does not say. However, important to remember fact-checking here, as there was probably very little done.
About to start chapter 10. We're getting heavy into the speculation and "never before revealed/seen" suspects of these unsolved cases. The book is divided pretty neatly into the first 7-8 being a fairly straightforward chronological narrative of the 5 murders and sightings/communications with the zodiac, and the 4-5 last chapter are really about the suspects and what the evidence does and does not say. However, important to remember fact-checking here, as there was probably very little done.
In the late 1960’s, and early 1970’s, an enigmatic serial killer terrorized the San Francisco …
The typos start to make themselves apparent around chapter 4 or 5, which is fun, but thankfully nothing too awful. Seems like transcription leftover awkwardness that got missed during the editing phase. A good reminder that these nonfiction projects often have non-existent fact-checking to go along with the inconsistent and very rushed copy proofing. While I haven't read anything so far that jumps out to me as incorrect based on my own cursory googling (not to be confused with research) it's still something to keep in mind with all this True Crime stuff.
The typos start to make themselves apparent around chapter 4 or 5, which is fun, but thankfully nothing too awful. Seems like transcription leftover awkwardness that got missed during the editing phase. A good reminder that these nonfiction projects often have non-existent fact-checking to go along with the inconsistent and very rushed copy proofing. While I haven't read anything so far that jumps out to me as incorrect based on my own cursory googling (not to be confused with research) it's still something to keep in mind with all this True Crime stuff.
"Paid work is absolutely central to the culture and politics of capitalist societies, yet today's …
👀
In the late 1960’s, and early 1970’s, an enigmatic serial killer terrorized the San Francisco …
So I finally rewatched the David Fincher film Zodiac (2007) yesterday (I had forgotten Jake Gyllenhaal's portrayal of Graysmith had really touched me when I was younger, because I was also called those names and considered creepy/obsessive as a young person — but I digress) and it made me want to reread in depth about the Zodiac, but I remembered that there were some fact-checking issues with Graysmith's original book. I don't like listening to podcast (or audiobooks, for that matter) which is unfortunately where most of the "True Crime" universe seems to live, so it felt lucky to stumble upon this book, which is essentially a write-up+documents+extras of the Morford and Ferguson podcast about the Zodiac case. Presented in chronological order, it's a very fast read, and I'm really enjoying it so far.
So I finally rewatched the David Fincher film Zodiac (2007) yesterday (I had forgotten Jake Gyllenhaal's portrayal of Graysmith had really touched me when I was younger, because I was also called those names and considered creepy/obsessive as a young person — but I digress) and it made me want to reread in depth about the Zodiac, but I remembered that there were some fact-checking issues with Graysmith's original book. I don't like listening to podcast (or audiobooks, for that matter) which is unfortunately where most of the "True Crime" universe seems to live, so it felt lucky to stumble upon this book, which is essentially a write-up+documents+extras of the Morford and Ferguson podcast about the Zodiac case. Presented in chronological order, it's a very fast read, and I'm really enjoying it so far.
@malorie What would you say is the "big solution" they're proposing?
(Also when it comes to nonfiction I'm a big fan of just... not finishing the book, lol, once the interesting bits are over.)
@malorie What would you say is the "big solution" they're proposing?
(Also when it comes to nonfiction I'm a big fan of just... not finishing the book, lol, once the interesting bits are over.)
